The article you have requested is older than 7 days. Please register to view this article. If you have already registered, login.
Last updated on May 21 at 4:39 am
- Other stories by Kevin Braciszeski:
- City council approved marina dredging contract
- Budget, layoffs on LAS agenda
- Council seeks opinions on proposed historic district
- Police investigate bones found in Riverton Twp.
- Michael Heinrich is LHS 2013 All-Around Senior
Related Stories:
Hart Historic District continues to grow
More sculptures on deck
Historic District plans to be unveiled Oct. 22
- Today's Top Stories:
- Fire on Chauvez Road - home allowed to burn after rekindle due to dynamite inside
- WSCC to seek millage renewal
- Todd and Brad Reed's new book is a tribute to Michigan
- Tight Lines for Troops was about more than fishing
- Appreciation offered for Honor Guard, Color Guard
- Notable: Vicki PoplsteinWine and Art brings in money for scholarships
- City council approved marina dredging contract
- Todd and Brad Reed's new book is a tribute to Michigan
- Tight Lines for Troops was about more than fishing
- Appreciation offered for Honor Guard, Color Guard
Today in LDN History
- Visitor Center to open Friday
- Academy vessel to dock at Waterfront Park seawall
- Harbor Festival events range from tall ship cruises to Fear Factor fun
- Ludington schools adds junior high alternative ed for fall
- Piping plovers are back
Reader Comments
Please, no posting of links or URLs in the comment area. This area is for your commentary, links will be deleted from posts. Comments are moderated on a daily basis.Two people in the proposed area came to support the plan?! Sounds like this historic district is dead in the water. Good news for people who believe their home is their castle and don't need others to tell them how to improve it.
Dolores, you might want to read it. Twelve people in the area attended, "AT LEAST" two people were for it and mentioned by name, two were against it, and then two were mentioned to be undecided but skeptical. You are as negative as Eddie is.
EJT, I believe that it is positive to be against a public/private entity whose sole purposes are to take away the rights of individual and what they do with their property, and secure public tax money through grants to do projects that will benefit private interests. Typically, wealthy private interests.



Stories Commented Recently:- Budget, layoffs on LAS agenda
- Soccer and swimming results